Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CARESSE SOLANGE E., etc., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Wallace E., Respondent-Appellant, Celena W., Respondent, Little Flower Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan Larabee, J.), entered on or about June 29, 1999, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent's parental rights to the subject child and committed her custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Clear and convincing evidence supports Family Court's finding that, despite the agency's diligent efforts, respondent permanently neglected the subject child by failing to plan for her return for more than a year after she had been placed with the agency (Social Services Law § 384-b[7][a]; see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 142-143, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824). During the relevant one-year period, the last nine months of which respondent was incarcerated after having been released from a five-year incarceration at the beginning of the period, respondent failed to file a petition to establish paternity, complete drug rehabilitation and parenting skills training, or find work and appropriate housing, all of which the agency had discussed with him as necessary aspects of planning for the child's future. Given that respondent was incarcerated at the time of the dispositional hearing and would remain so for at least a year after Family Court's determination, and that respondent and the child never developed any real relationship, a suspended judgment was not in the child's best interests (see Matter of Shaka Efion C., 207 A.D.2d 740, 616 N.Y.S.2d 620).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 08, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)