Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dora Lynn R. BONDS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J.), entered August 21, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict, awarded plaintiff damages in the amount of $442,900, plus interest, costs and disbursements, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The trial evidence, fairly considered (see Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 134, 495 N.Y.S.2d 184), enabled the jury to conclude that defendant had been negligent, both in failing to mop the floor upon which plaintiff slipped and in failing to take reasonable precautions to prevent another overflow of a nearby slop sink. The causal connection between this negligence and plaintiff's harm was amply made out by evidence supporting the inference that the slippery substance upon which plaintiff slipped came from the slop sink, which photographs entered in evidence showed to have been covered in grime (see Johnson v. New York City Tr. Auth., 129 A.D.2d 424, 513 N.Y.S.2d 687, lv. denied 70 N.Y.2d 605, 519 N.Y.S.2d 1028, 513 N.E.2d 1308). Contrary to defendant's contention, the expert testimony of Robert Lichtenberger, a licensed plumbing contractor, was properly received. Lichtenberger's testimony was based on deposition testimony and photographs that had been entered in evidence, its consideration by the jury was appropriately limited by the trial court, and Lichtenberger was subject to cross-examination.
We have reviewed defendant's remaining points and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 12, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)