Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Robert DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Philip COOMBE, Jr., Acting Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
The inmate misbehavior report lodged against petitioner states that a 13-inch metal rod was found hidden in a window sill while petitioner's belongings were being packed by a correction officer. The hearing testimony establishes that petitioner resided in a “cube” in an open dorm area. The record is devoid of any evidence that petitioner had control over the window or had any connection to the rod. Therefore, we conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support the finding that petitioner possessed the rod (see, People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130, 139, 495 N.Y.S.2d 332, 485 N.E.2d 997; Matter of Sanchez v. Coughlin, 132 A.D.2d 896, 898, 518 N.Y.S.2d 456; Matter of Trudo v. LeFevre, 122 A.D.2d 319, 504 N.Y.S.2d 68). Thus, we modify the determination by annulling the finding that petitioner possessed a weapon. Because the record imposes one penalty and fails to specify any relation between the violations and the penalty imposed, the penalty is vacated, and the matter is remitted to respondent for imposition of an appropriate penalty on the charge sustained (see, Matter of Brooks v. Coughlin, 182 A.D.2d 1115, 1116, 583 N.Y.S.2d 91).
We have reviewed the remaining contentions raised in this proceeding and conclude that they are without merit.
Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 07, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)