Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Percy ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.), rendered June 21, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 13 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The hearing court correctly concluded that the requirements of the emergency doctrine were satisfied, justifying the officers' warrantless entry into defendant's apartment following defendant's removal therefrom (People v. Mitchell, 39 N.Y.2d 173, 177-178, 383 N.Y.S.2d 246, 347 N.E.2d 607, cert denied, 426 U.S. 953, 96 S.Ct. 3178, 49 L.Ed.2d 1191). The police had probable cause to believe that defendant had left a loaded pistol in the apartment, thus posing an immediate danger to children observed by the police to be present therein (see, People v. Johnson, 181 A.D.2d 103, 585 N.Y.S.2d 851, affd 81 N.Y.2d 980, 599 N.Y.S.2d 525, 615 N.E.2d 1009).
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample basis for the jury's conclusion that the pistol was loaded at the time defendant possessed it during an altercation that occurred in front of his apartment building. This included eyewitness descriptions of defendant's manipulation of the weapon during the incident, the firearms expert's testimony concerning the functioning of the weapon, defendant's conduct during his flight from the police, and the immediate recovery of the weapon in a loaded condition.
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)