IN RE: KATRINA TUTTLE (2023)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

IN RE: KATRINA TUTTLE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. KRISTINE WORTHINGTON, DONALD WORTHINGTON, ANDREW WORTHINGTON, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, AND ALLEGANY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. MICHAEL J. CAPUTO, ESQ., ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

535 Decided: August 11, 2023

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND OGDEN, JJ.

KAMAN BERLOVE LLP, ROCHESTER (GARY MULDOON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS KRISTINE WORTHINGTON AND DONALD WORTHINGTON. THOMAS L. PELYCH, HORNELL, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT ANDREW WORTHINGTON. MICHAEL J. CAPUTO, ROCHESTER, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, APPELLANT PRO SE. ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (LYLE T. HAJDU OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals are unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Tuttle v Worthington ([appeal No. 2] — AD3d — [Aug. 11, 2023] [4th Dept 2023]).

Entered: August 11, 2023

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network