Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of Thomas McDERMOTT, Petitioner, For a Judgment, etc., v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents.
Determination of respondent Commissioner of the New York City Department of Correction, dated August 19, 1996, finding petitioner guilty of various charges and specifications, and dismissing him from his employment with the Department, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [William McCooe, J.], entered March 5, 1997), dismissed, without costs.
Substantial evidence supports the finding of respondent that petitioner was absent without leave during several days in March 1994 and again from January 1995 until the date of the administrative hearing in 1996 (see, Pell v. Board of Education, 34 N.Y.2d 222, 230, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321). The record further supports the hearing officer's finding, after assessing testimony from various witnesses, including petitioner and his family members, that petitioner was guilty of multiple instances of failure to obey lawful orders of his superiors, and of a pattern of harassment of a superior officer and that officer's family. We find no basis to disturb the determinations of credibility made by the trier of fact (see, Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193).
Under the circumstances, the penalty imposed is not so disproportionate to the proven offenses as to shock our sense of fairness (see, Matter of Trotta v. Ward, 77 N.Y.2d 827, 828, 566 N.Y.S.2d 199, 567 N.E.2d 241; Matter of Alfieri v. Murphy, 38 N.Y.2d 976, 977, 384 N.Y.S.2d 157, 348 N.E.2d 614).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 26, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)