Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth FULLER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J. at hearing; Roger S. Hayes, J. at plea and sentence), rendered July 18, 2003, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 5 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761, 395 N.Y.S.2d 635, 363 N.E.2d 1380 [1977] ). The police were, at the very least, entitled to detain defendant in order to issue a summons for violation of the Open Container Law (Administrative Code of City of New York § 10-125[b] ). The officer's action of placing his arm on defendant's back, at waist level, to guide him toward the police car was incidental to such detention and did not constitute a frisk (see People v. Chin, 192 A.D.2d 413, 596 N.Y.S.2d 391 [1993], lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 1071, 601 N.Y.S.2d 590, 619 N.E.2d 668 [1993] ). We also note that defendant had been uncooperative in that he failed to comply with the officer's requests (see People v. Bothwell, 261 A.D.2d 232, 690 N.Y.S.2d 231 [1999], lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 1026, 697 N.Y.S.2d 585, 719 N.E.2d 946 [1999] ). When the officer felt what he recognized to be a firearm at defendant's waist, he was justified in arresting him for weapon possession.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 01, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)