Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
D.R. WATSON HOLDINGS, LLC, and Innovative Transmissions & Engine Co., LLC, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. CALIBER ONE INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
We agree with defendant that Supreme Court erred in granting that part of plaintiffs' motion seeking to confirm the appraisal award and in awarding plaintiffs the amount of $1,810,920 as the replacement cost of the heating system, and we therefore modify the order accordingly. Pursuant to the commercial property insurance policy issued by defendant, plaintiffs are not entitled to recover the replacement cost of the heating system “[u]ntil the lost or damaged property is actually repaired or replaced․” Because plaintiffs have not repaired or replaced the heating system, the measure of their damage is actual cash value, not replacement cost (see Harrington v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co., 223 A.D.2d 222, 228, 645 N.Y.S.2d 221, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 808, 655 N.Y.S.2d 888, 678 N.E.2d 501). We thus further modify the order by awarding plaintiffs the actual cash value of the heating system with leave to reapply to Supreme Court for further relief upon the replacement of the heating system within 180 days of plaintiffs' receipt of the actual cash value, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court to determine the actual cash value following a hearing, if necessary. We otherwise affirm the order for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying that part of the motion seeking to confirm the appraisal award and by providing in the penultimate ordering paragraph that the amount of damages is the actual cash value of the heating system and as modified the order is affirmed without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 04, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)