Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: OSBOURNE S., Petitioner-Respondent, v. REGINA S., Respondent-Appellant.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma A. Cordova, J.), entered on or about August 22, 2006, which, after a hearing, granted petitioner father's petition for custody of the subject child, and awarded liberal visitation to respondent mother, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court's conclusion that an award of custody to the father with liberal visitation to the mother was in the best interests of the child has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see generally Miller v. Pipia, 297 A.D.2d 362, 364, 746 N.Y.S.2d 729 [2002]; Domestic Relations Law § 70[a] ). The totality of the circumstances considered by the court showed that the home environments of both parents were suitable, that both parents had the means to adequately provide for the child's material needs, and that both parents had similar abilities to provide for the emotional and intellectual development of the child, who has special needs (see Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 172, 451 N.Y.S.2d 658, 436 N.E.2d 1260 [1982] ). However, the mother's negative attitude and hostility toward the father, as evidenced by her maligning of the father in the child's presence, the filing of unsubstantiated reports of abuse and neglect against him, and encouraging the child to lie to support her false claims, failed to demonstrate a willingness or ability on her part to facilitate and encourage a close and optimum relationship between the child and his father (see Janecka v. Franklin, 150 A.D.2d 755, 757, 542 N.Y.S.2d 206 [1989] ). The court's decision was also in accord with the Law Guardian's recommendation that the child be placed in the custody of the father (see Matter of Krebsbach v. Gallagher, 181 A.D.2d 363, 368, 587 N.Y.S.2d 346 [1992], lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 701, 594 N.Y.S.2d 715, 610 N.E.2d 388 [1992] ). Furthermore, the granting of liberal visitation to the mother ensures that she will remain an integral part of the child's life and furthers the goal of allowing the child to be nurtured and guided by both of his natural parents (see Weiss v. Weiss, 52 N.Y.2d 170, 175, 436 N.Y.S.2d 862, 418 N.E.2d 377 [1981]; Courten v. Courten, 92 A.D.2d 579, 580, 459 N.Y.S.2d 464 [1983] ).
We have considered the mother's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 28, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)