Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Martha STEVENS, as Power of Attorney for Kathryn Rowell, Petitioner, v. ONONDAGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, New York State Department of Health, and State of New York, Respondents.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination confirming the decision denying her request for Medicaid benefits for her mother following a fair hearing. The determination is based on the failure of petitioner to provide requested documentation concerning three bank accounts and her father's estate and, contrary to petitioner's contention, the determination is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Rossman v. Novella, 300 A.D.2d 483, 751 N.Y.S.2d 423; Green Manor Assoc. v. Beaudoin, 285 A.D.2d 807, 809, 727 N.Y.S.2d 759; Matter of Frohlinger v. DeBuono, 278 A.D.2d 323, 324, 718 N.Y.S.2d 208). Even accepting as true the assertion of petitioner that she had little knowledge of her parents' finances, we nevertheless conclude that petitioner is not thereby relieved of her obligation to provide the requested documentation (see Matter of Chase v. New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 252 A.D.2d 612, 613-614, 675 N.Y.S.2d 203, lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 813, 681 N.Y.S.2d 474, 704 N.E.2d 227). Finally, although we may properly take judicial notice of the fact that petitioner's subsequent request for Medicaid benefits was also denied (see generally Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Buffalo v. Munoz, 4 A.D.3d 879, 880, 772 N.Y.S.2d 147), we conclude that the present proceeding is not rendered moot by that denial (see 18 NYCRR 360-2.4).
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination be and the same hereby is unanimously confirmed without costs and the amended petition is dismissed.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 14, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)