Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of John KURYAK, Petitioner-Appellant-Respondent, v. Lawrence F. ADAMCZYK and Ralph M. Mohr, as Commissioners of and Constituting Erie County Board of Elections, Respondents-Respondents,
Kathleen M. Staniszewski, Respondent-Respondent-Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) Matter of Anthony J. Mingarelli, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant-Respondent, v. Lawrence F. Adamczyk and Ralph M. Mohr, as Commissioners of and Constituting Erie County Board of Elections, Respondents-Respondents, Ronald R. Spadone, Respondent-Respondent-Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Supreme Court properly denied the applications seeking to bar respondent Kathleen M. Staniszewski from being elected to a third term as mayor and respondent Ronald R. Spadone from being elected to a third term as councilman. Those respondents were in their first terms of office when Lackawanna City Charter section 4.1 was amended to provide that the mayor “shall not be eligible to serve more than two (2) consecutive terms”, and section 3.1 was amended to provide that “[n]o Councilman shall serve more than two (2) consecutive four (4) year terms.” “It is a fundamental canon of statutory construction that retroactive operation is not favored by courts and statutes will not be given such construction unless the language expressly or by necessary implication requires it” (Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Cent. School Dist., 91 N.Y.2d 577, 584, 673 N.Y.S.2d 966, 696 N.E.2d 978; see, McKinney's Consolidated Laws of N.Y., Book 1, Statutes § 51[b] ). Here, the amendments use the term “shall”. “As a question of intention, a statute framed in future words, such as ‘shall’ or ‘hereafter,’ is construed as prospective only” (Comment, McKinney's Consolidated Laws of N.Y., Book 1, Statutes § 51 [b]; see, Matter of Dillon v. Coughlin, 143 Misc.2d 207, 214, 539 N.Y.S.2d 880, affd. 153 A.D.2d 50, 550 N.Y.S.2d 115, lv. denied 76 N.Y.2d 701, 558 N.Y.S.2d 891, 557 N.E.2d 1187).
Cross appeals unanimously dismissed (see, CPLR 5511; Town of Massena v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 45 N.Y.2d 482, 488, 410 N.Y.S.2d 276, 382 N.E.2d 1139; Matter of Brown v. Starkweather, 197 A.D.2d 840, 841, 602 N.Y.S.2d 449, lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 653, 602 N.Y.S.2d 802, 622 N.E.2d 303) and order affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: August 18, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)