Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
G. Nelson GETZ, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Eric Getz, an Infant Over the Age of 14, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Milton SEARLES, Rist Transport, Ltd., Kathleen Bourne, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jacqueline Bourne, Deceased, County of Ontario, Town of Phelps, Defendants-Respondents, Gabriele Auto Place, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries sustained by his son, Eric Getz, when the Ford Mustang in which Eric was a passenger collided with a truck. Defendant Gabriele Auto Place, Inc. (Gabriele) had sold the Mustang on July 20, 1994 to Jacqueline Bourne, who took possession of the vehicle that day. Bourne was operating the Mustang with dealer's plates when the accident occurred on August 25, 1994.
Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendants Milton Searles and Rist Transport, Ltd. and the cross motion of plaintiff and granted judgment declaring that Gabriele is the owner of the Mustang and is vicariously liable for Bourne's alleged negligence in operating the Mustang. The court also properly denied the cross motion of Gabriele for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. The record establishes that Gabriele violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 416 by permitting Bourne to use its dealer's plates for over a month and failing to notify the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles of Bourne's failure to return the plates before the expiration of six days after Bourne took possession of the vehicle (see, Jamison v. Walker, 48 A.D.2d 320, 324, 369 N.Y.S.2d 469). Under those circumstances, Gabriele is estopped from denying ownership of the Mustang (see, Switzer v. Aldrich, 307 N.Y. 56, 58-59, 120 N.E.2d 159; Reese v. Reamore, 292 N.Y. 292, 296-297, 55 N.E.2d 35; Jamison v. Walker, supra, at 324, 369 N.Y.S.2d 469; see also, Brown v. Harper, 231 A.D.2d 483, 484, 647 N.Y.S.2d 245; Taylor v. Botnick Motor Corp., 146 A.D.2d 81, 84-85, 539 N.Y.S.2d 141).
Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 01, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)