Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kale MADDOX, Defendant-Appellant.
Pursuant to a remittitur order of this Court, Supreme Court conducted a hearing to determine the contents of notes taken by a police officer who participated in a “buy and bust” operation but who did not testify at trial and to determine whether those notes were lost, destroyed or still in the possession of the People (People v. Maddox, 256 A.D.2d 1066, 685 N.Y.S.2d 149). That officer was the sole witness at the hearing and testified that he made no notes. The court, crediting the officer's testimony, determined that there were no notes, and thus no Rosario violation. There is no basis for this Court to disturb that determination (see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761, 395 N.Y.S.2d 635, 363 N.E.2d 1380).
Judgment unanimously affirmed.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 01, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)