Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CHANDEL B., Jr., etc., and Another, Children under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Beverly O., etc., Respondent-Appellant, Episcopal Social Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about March 12, 2008, which, inter alia, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights to the subject children, and committed custody and guardianship of the children to the Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner agency for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly concluded that it was in the children's best interests to terminate respondent's parental rights, and that a suspended judgment was not warranted. Although respondent made some progress prior to the dispositional hearing, by completing parenting skills and domestic violence classes, such progress was insufficient to warrant the further prolonging of the children's unsettled situation (see Matter of Maryline A., 22 A.D.3d 227, 228, 802 N.Y.S.2d 29 [2005] ). Demonstrating a lack of understanding to the needs of the children, respondent continued to live in an abusive relationship with the children's biological father (see Matter of Louise D., 227 A.D.2d 177, 641 N.Y.S.2d 670 [1996] ), and has shown no ability to plan for the needs of the children, remaining without a suitable home for many years. Respondent has also unilaterally ceased her mental health therapy and medication, has failed to submit to a psychological evaluation, and visits the children only sporadically.
Furthermore, the record demonstrates that Quintin O. has lived with his maternal great aunt for most of his life, while Chandel B., has lived in this same stable environment for his entire life, both in excess of five years. The good relationship between the maternal great aunt and the children was attested to by the agency and respondent alike (see Matter of Milan N., 45 A.D.3d 358, 846 N.Y.S.2d 18 [2007], lv. denied 10 A.D.3d 703, 783 N.Y.S.2d 601 [2008]; Matter of Arriola Nicole S., 45 A.D.3d 407, 845 N.Y.S.2d 320 [2007] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 21, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)