Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Mai-Linh DeVIRGILIO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FELLER PRECISION STAGE LIFTS, INC., et al., Defendants, Mamma Mia Broadway Limited Partners, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Friedman, J.), entered January 2, 2007, upon a jury verdict, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarded plaintiff $1 million for future pain and suffering and $500,000 for future lost earnings, unanimously modified, on the law, to vacate the award for future lost earnings, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The then 25-year-old plaintiff, while working as a stagehand, was injured when a “Genie lift” tipped over and fell on her, causing her to sustain a crush fracture to her pelvis and fibula, a fractured sacrum, and rib fractures. The evidence demonstrated that she still suffered from pain, for which she took painkillers up to five times a week, that she had an increased risk of degenerative disease in her spine, as well as an increased risk of arthritis, and that she suffered and would continue to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder. The jury found that plaintiff's pain and suffering would continue for 53 years. The jury's award of $1 million for future pain and suffering does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances.
However, plaintiff failed to sustain her burden of establishing loss of wages with reasonable certainty (see Man-Kit Lei v. City Univ. of N.Y., 33 A.D.3d 467, 468, 823 N.Y.S.2d 129 [2006], lv. denied 8 N.Y.3d 806, 832 N.Y.S.2d 488, 864 N.E.2d 618 [2007] ). She testified that she had returned to the job she held before the accident, at the same rate of pay. Further, the only evidence of future lost earnings was plaintiff's own unsubstantiated opinion concerning her potential income as a substitute stagehand (see Harris v. City of New York, 2 A.D.3d 782, 783-784, 770 N.Y.S.2d 380 [2003], lv. dismissed 2 N.Y.3d 758, 778 N.Y.S.2d 773, 811 N.E.2d 35 [2004] ).
We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining contentions.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 24, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)