Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: DAVID H., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about May 25, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute unlawful possession of an air pistol in violation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 10-131(b)(1), and imposed a conditional discharge for a period of 12 months, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the petition dismissed.
To establish the charge of unlawful possession of an air pistol in violation of § 10-131(b)(1) of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, the presentment agency was required to prove, inter alia, that appellant possessed the air pistol. The evidence was legally insufficient to establish that appellant possessed the air pistol. On the possession issue, the evidence established only that a teacher saw appellant inside a closet area “flipping the top of his pants out a little” so that another student could not look in; she was unable to see what, if anything he had in his pants. At some point thereafter-the record does not indicate how long thereafter-a school safety agent saw appellant in an adjoining classroom standing near a group of lockers. One of the lockers was “kind of cracked open” and the agent found the air pistol in that locker when he opened it. The agent did not see appellant put anything into the locker nor was there any evidence the locker was assigned to appellant. The evidence established only proximity to, not possession of, the air pistol.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 22, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)