Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Augustine NTIM, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FOREST CITY ASSOCIATES, Defendant-Respondent. [And A Third-Party Action.]
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, Jr., J.), entered June 4, 1997, which granted defendant's posttrial motion to set aside the verdict in plaintiffs' favor and directed entry of judgment in defendant's favor dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to delete that portion of the order stating that the dismissal is predicated upon the weight of the evidence and substitute therefor the direction that the verdict be set aside and that judgment be directed in plaintiff's favor dismissing the complaint by reason of plaintiff's failure to make out a prima facie case, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
In this personal injury action involving allegations that plaintiff Augustine Ntim was shot and robbed by two armed assailants in the parking garage where he was employed, the IAS court properly set aside the jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs since plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that defendant landlord knew, or had reason to know, of prior criminal activity upon the subject premises (cf., Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 50 N.Y.2d 507, 519, 429 N.Y.S.2d 606, 407 N.E.2d 451). In addition, we note that the trial evidence established conclusively that, contrary to plaintiffs' contention, there was no causal connection between any malfunction in the garage's security gate and the assault upon plaintiff. Even if the gate had been operating properly, plaintiff's assailants would still have gained entry to the garage and thus, the requisite causal link between any negligence and plaintiff's injury would be lacking (see, Boltax v. Joy Day Camp, 67 N.Y.2d 617, 619, 499 N.Y.S.2d 660, 490 N.E.2d 527).
We modify as indicated above only to conform the order to the IAS court's decision upon defendant's motion to set aside the verdict, which decision sets forth the proper ground for the dismissal we affirm, namely, that plaintiff failed to make out a prima facie case.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 01, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)