Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Scott H. HALBERG, Appellant.
Defendant was convicted of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02[1], [4] ) and one count each of reckless endangerment in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.20) and menacing in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.15). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient to support the verdict (see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672) and that the verdict with respect to the two weapons counts is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v. Yeldon, 251 A.D.2d 1047, 675 N.Y.S.2d 262; People v. De Jac, 219 A.D.2d 102, 106, 637 N.Y.S.2d 874, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 935, 647 N.Y.S.2d 168, 670 N.E.2d 452). County Court properly permitted the People to introduce into evidence excerpts from the owner's manual for the weapon that defendant was charged with possessing. The manual was found in a locked briefcase, which also contained various personal papers bearing defendant's name, including defendant's membership card for the National Rifle Association. The manual was relevant to the issue of possession and therefore admissible (see, People v. Scarola, 71 N.Y.2d 769, 777, 530 N.Y.S.2d 83, 525 N.E.2d 728). Because defendant failed to object to the jury instruction challenged on appeal and, indeed, stipulated to that instruction before it was given, no issue with respect to the instruction is preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v. Moyer, 237 A.D.2d 990, 656 N.Y.S.2d 993, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 1097, 660 N.Y.S.2d 391, 682 N.E.2d 992).
Judgment unanimously affirmed.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 02, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)