Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mark MAJORS, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25[4] ) arising from the death of the three-month-old victim. Contrary to defendant's contention, County Court did not err in permitting the People to present evidence of defendant's prior physical abuse of the victim. The indictment and bill of particulars charged defendant with shaking the victim and/or “impacting” the victim's head against an object on April 5, 1999, causing the victim's death. Prior to the trial, the People notified defendant that they planned to introduce evidence that at some time in March 1999 he had committed other bad acts, including shaking the victim, thereby causing a skull fracture, broken ribs, and bleeding in the brain. Those injuries had begun to heal in the interval between the acts in March and the acts of April 5 that resulted in the death of the three-month old victim. Pursuant to that notification, the court held a Ventimiglia hearing and properly determined that evidence concerning the prior bad acts of March 1999 was admissible. The admission of evidence of a defendant's physical abuse of a victim prior to the victim's death is proper because such evidence is “material and relevant on the issues whether defendant's actions evinced a depraved indifference to human life, and whether [the victim's] death was accidental” (People v. Holloway, 185 A.D.2d 646, 647, 586 N.Y.S.2d 172). Because the jury was instructed to consider only the acts of April 5, 1999 in reaching its verdict, there is no merit to the further contention of defendant that he was convicted of an uncharged crime. We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 01, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)