Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of James VARGO, Petitioner, For a Judgment, etc., v. Howard SAFIR, etc., et al., Respondents.
Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated February 15, 2000, dismissing petitioner from his position as a police officer, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of finding that petitioner was suspended without pay for more than 30 days and therefore may be entitled to back pay under Civil Service Law § 75(3-a), the matter remanded to respondents for a determination regarding such back pay, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [William McCooe, J.], entered September 25, 2000), otherwise disposed of by confirming the remainder of the determination, without costs.
The findings that petitioner was the driver of a hit run car while off duty and that he used illegal drugs are supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Wilson v. City of White Plains, 95 N.Y.2d 783, 784-785, 710 N.Y.S.2d 303, 731 N.E.2d 1111). No basis exists to disturb respondents' credibility determinations (see, Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443-444, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193). The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness (see, Matter of Kelly v. Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, 38, 39-40, 724 N.Y.S.2d 680, 747 N.E.2d 1280). Respondents concede that the matter should be remanded for a determination of any back pay to which petitioner may be entitled under Civil Service Law § 75(3-a).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 14, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)