Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: KWESI H. and Others, Dependent Children under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Sharnette T., et al., Respondents-Appellants, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about October 23, 2003, which, upon a fact-finding determination that respondents mother and father, inter alia, abused Kwesi H. and derivatively abused Menelik H. and Judinyah H., placed the subject children in the custody of petitioner Administration for Children's Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed insofar as it brings up the fact-finding determination, and the appeal otherwise dismissed as moot, without costs.
The placement has been rendered moot by the expiration of the dispositional order from which respondents appeal (see Matter of Taisha R., 14 A.D.3d 410, 788 N.Y.S.2d 357 [2005] ). A preponderance of the evidence supports Family Court's findings of abuse, including a showing that one of the children suffered severe burns and another suffered an arm broken in two places (see Family Ct. Act § 1046[a][ii]; Matter of Philip M., 82 N.Y.2d 238, 243-245, 604 N.Y.S.2d 40, 624 N.E.2d 168 [1993]; Matter of Benjamin L., 9 A.D.3d 153, 780 N.Y.S.2d 8 [2004]; Matter of Nicole H., 12 A.D.3d 182, 183, 783 N.Y.S.2d 575 [2004] ), and neglect (see Family Ct. Act § 1046[a][ii]; Matter of Nyomi A.D., 10 A.D.3d 684, 685-686, 783 N.Y.S.2d 596 [2004]; Matter of Jorge S., 211 A.D.2d 513, 621 N.Y.S.2d 66 [1995] ). Were we to review the placement issue, we would find it clear that the best interests of the children would not have been served by returning them to appellants.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 28, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)