Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Daquasia PAYNE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The STATE of New York, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered June 6, 2006, which, inter alia, granted defendants' cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3211, and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The complaint, which is devoid of allegations of systemic, district-wide educational deficiencies attributable to a lack of funding by the State, fails to state a cognizable claim under the Education Article (art. XI, § 1) of the New York State Constitution (see New York Civil Liberties Union v. State of New York, 4 N.Y.3d 175, 180-182, 791 N.Y.S.2d 507, 824 N.E.2d 947 [2005]; Paynter v. State, 100 N.Y.2d 434, 440-441, 765 N.Y.S.2d 819, 797 N.E.2d 1225 [2003]; Campaign for Fiscal Equity v. State of New York, 86 N.Y.2d 307, 317-319, 631 N.Y.S.2d 565, 655 N.E.2d 661 [1995] [CFE II] ). In any event, plaintiffs claims are barred by res judicata based upon the recently concluded litigation in Campaign For Fiscal Equity (CFE) v. State of New York, 8 N.Y.3d 14, 828 N.Y.S.2d 235, 861 N.E.2d 50 [2006]. It is clear that the CFE plaintiffs represented the interests of all New York City school children and that the relief obtained-a declaratory judgment that the State was inadequately funding the New York City public school system and an order directing the State to implement financing reforms to fund the City public school system adequately (see Campaign for Fiscal Equity v. State of New York, 100 N.Y.2d 893, 769 N.Y.S.2d 106, 801 N.E.2d 326 [2003] and 8 N.Y.3d 14, 828 N.Y.S.2d 235, 861 N.E.2d 50, supra )-was for the benefit of all City school children, including plaintiffs (see Buechel v. Bain, 97 N.Y.2d 295, 304, 740 N.Y.S.2d 252, 766 N.E.2d 914 [2001], cert. denied 535 U.S. 1096, 122 S.Ct. 2293, 152 L.Ed.2d 1051 [2002]; Green v. Santa Fe Indus., 70 N.Y.2d 244, 253, 519 N.Y.S.2d 793, 514 N.E.2d 105 [1987]; Weisz v. Levitt, 59 A.D.2d 1002, 399 N.Y.S.2d 720 [1977]; Stissing Natl. Bank v. Kaplan, 28 A.D.2d 1159, 284 N.Y.S.2d 320 [1967] ).
Plaintiffs' remaining arguments are unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 10, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)