Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Christian J. COCINA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ERIE, Defendant-Appellant, Brian S. Heckman, Defendant-Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained when the motorcycle that he was operating was struck by a vehicle owned and operated by defendant Brian S. Heckman at an intersection in the Town of Eden. Plaintiff was proceeding easterly toward the intersection, which was controlled by a stop sign. Heckman was proceeding northerly toward the intersection on a different road and had the right-of-way. Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of Heckman for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and the cross claim of defendant County of Erie (County) against him. In support of his motion, Heckman submitted his deposition testimony in which he stated that he was driving on the right-hand side of the road, that he looked both ways before entering the intersection, and that he did not observe plaintiff's motorcycle until it had proceeded into the intersection immediately in front of his vehicle. However, Heckman also submitted the deposition testimony of plaintiff, who stated that he initially stopped at the stop sign and then crept forward in order to have a clearer view of the intersection. According to plaintiff, he came to a second complete stop less than two feet ahead of the stop sign, but before entering the intersection, at which time Heckman's vehicle struck his motorcycle. Thus, by his own submissions, Heckman raised a triable issue of fact whether he was negligent (see Harper v. Corsaro, 306 A.D.2d 838, 839, 761 N.Y.S.2d 565; see generally Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718), and the burden never shifted to plaintiff or the County (see generally Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853, 487 N.Y.S.2d 316, 476 N.E.2d 642).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied and the complaint and cross claim against defendant Brian S. Heckman are reinstated.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 06, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)