SULLIVAN v. GREENE ZINNER (1999)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.

Cynthia SULLIVAN, Doing Business as Sullivan Reporting, Respondent, v. GREENE & ZINNER, P. C., Appellant.

Decided: November 23, 1999

BEFORE: INGRASSIA, J.P., PALELLA, and LEVITT, JJ.

Greene & Zinner, P. C., White Plains (Stanley S. Zinner of counsel), appellant pro se. Valdespino Copland, L.L.P., Tarrytown (Laura Copland of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment unanimously reversed without costs, plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment denied and matter remanded to the court below for all further proceedings.

Plaintiff alleged in her affidavit that all bills for her services were sent to defendant and paid for on the defendant firm's own checks. However, at best, this presents a question of fact as to whether the attorneys assumed responsibility for payment (Urban Court Reporting v. Davis, 158 A.D.2d 401, 551 N.Y.S.2d 235).

MEMORANDUM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network