Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
GUANG JING CHEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sharon H. GOLDSTEIN, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered November 12, 1996, which granted plaintiff's motion to reargue a prior order granting defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 on default, and, upon reargument, adhered to the prior order, unanimously modified, on the law, to deem plaintiff's motion as one to vacate his default, and, so considered, the motion denied and the order otherwise affirmed, without costs.
We credit plaintiff's attorney's representation that he never received defendants' amended CPLR 3126 notice of motion, necessitated by some unspecified clerical mishap that prevented defendants' first motion for that relief, admittedly received by plaintiff's attorney, from being placed on the court's motion calendar. Nevertheless, we sustain the dismissal of complaint since plaintiff fails to offer a reasonable excuse for his noncompliance with defendants' notices of physical examinations. The willful and contumacious character of this noncompliance can be inferred from plaintiff's disappearance and failure to keep his attorney informed of his whereabouts for at least the 11-month period between the attorney's receipt of the notices of physical examination and the date plaintiff was located, more than three months after the CPLR 3126 motion had been granted on default (see, Reitte v. Entermy Cab Corp., 162 A.D.2d 259, 556 N.Y.S.2d 617). Nor does plaintiff's attorney show that his efforts to locate plaintiff during this period were diligent.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 15, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)