Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Anne L. CHANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ABYSSINIAN BAPTIST CHURCH, Defendant-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about April 30, 1996, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in this slip-and-fall personal injury action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
We agree with the IAS court that to hold that defendant created a reasonably foreseeable hazard by providing an unsecured step stool for children to access a hallway water fountain would be to stretch the concept of foreseeability beyond acceptable limits. Certainly there is no evidence that defendant had actual notice of the water that had spilled in front of the fountain, or that the water was present for a sufficient length of time before the accident to permit defendant's employees to discover and remedy it, or that defendant had actual knowledge of any prior spillage of water in front of the fountain, or that spillage was an ongoing and recurring condition that was routinely left unaddressed (cf., O'Connor-Miele v. Barhite & Holzinger, 234 A.D.2d 106, 650 N.Y.S.2d 717). Nor is an issue of fact as to defendant's notice of a recurring condition raised by plaintiff's unsupported assertion that it is common knowledge that children are careless and that water will splash from fountains. A mere “general awareness” that some dangerous condition may be present is legally insufficient to constitute notice of a particular condition (see, Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp., 84 N.Y.2d 967, 969, 622 N.Y.S.2d 493, 646 N.E.2d 795). We have considered plaintiff's other contentions and find them to be without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 15, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)