Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dr. W. Norman SCOTT, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered September 26, 2007, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's first two causes of action for breach of an employment contract, with leave to renew following the completion of discovery, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the first two causes of action dismissed.
The record on appeal contains ample undisputed evidence supporting defendant Beth Israel Medical Center's determination that plaintiff breached the duty of good faith and loyalty he owed it (see Maritime Fish Prods. v. World-Wide Fish Prods., 100 A.D.2d 81, 87-88, 474 N.Y.S.2d 281 [1984], appeal dismissed 63 N.Y.2d 675 [1984] ), and demonstrating as a matter of law that its dissatisfaction with his conduct was genuine, affording it good cause to terminate his employment (see Golden v. Worldvision Enters., 133 A.D.2d 50, 51, 519 N.Y.S.2d 1 [1987], lv. denied 71 N.Y.2d 804, 528 N.Y.S.2d 829, 524 N.E.2d 149 [1988] ).
While an individual may seek another position before leaving his or her employment, he or she may not make use of the employer's time, facilities or proprietary secrets in preparation for engaging in a competing business or endeavor (see Maritime Fish Prods., 100 A.D.2d at 88, 474 N.Y.S.2d 281). Plaintiff not only began offering himself to Beth Israel's competitors while there were still years left on his contract, but also, in the process, offered the services of the entire Orthopedics Department, without even obtaining the permission of all the affected doctors, and used his position as chairman of the department to obtain various confidential documents containing contractual and financial information that Beth Israel did not provide to the public and that it disseminated internally on a need-to-know basis, and turned these documents over to Beth Israel's competitors (see Bronx-Lebanon Hosp. Ctr. v. Wiznia, 284 A.D.2d 265, 265-266, 726 N.Y.S.2d 847 [2001], lv. dismissed 97 N.Y.2d 653, 737 N.Y.S.2d 53, 762 N.E.2d 931 [2001]; Gibbs v. Breed, Abbott & Morgan, 271 A.D.2d 180, 185-186, 710 N.Y.S.2d 578 [2000] ).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 29, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)