Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Joseph BRAINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lucille DeVITO-BRAINE, Defendant-Respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin Diamond, J.), entered July 11, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from, as limited by the briefs, directed plaintiff husband to pay defendant wife child support of $84.67 a week, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the trial court's finding, largely one of credibility, imputing to plaintiff $28,000 of yearly income (see, Thoreson v. Penthouse Intl., 80 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 591 N.Y.S.2d 978, 606 N.E.2d 1369). Such evidence includes plaintiff's failure to produce any tax returns subsequent to 1990 although he admitted to paying estimated taxes, the lack of documentary corroboration for his testimony that he has been living off only his savings, the parties' lifestyle, which includes a second home, and the testimony of plaintiff's own family members concerning his skills and ability to earn a living notwithstanding the disabilities for which he receives Social Security benefits. Nor was it necessary for the trial court to explicitly state whether it was deviating from the child support guidelines of Domestic Relations Law § 240(1-b), where the court made it clear that it was applying the standard 17% guideline. Insofar as plaintiff challenges the order entered on or about April 10, 2000, directing entry of a judgment against him for child support arrears, the appeal therefrom was dismissed by order of this Court dated May 17, 2001. We have considered and rejected plaintiff's other arguments.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 08, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)