Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Joan KRAFT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael KAMALIAN, M.D., Defendant-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Esposito, J.), entered October 16, 2000, which granted defendant's motion for a change of venue from Bronx County to Orange County, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion denied, without costs.
In this medical malpractice action, commenced on November 1996, the motion court erred in granting defendant's motion for a change of venue from Bronx County, where plaintiff resided from the summer of 1995 until late 1998, to Orange County, where she received medical treatment from defendant from 1991 through 1995, and where she resided during that time.
The motion, brought more than three years after the commencement of the action, and more than a year after the filing of the note of issue, was untimely (CPLR 511(a); see also, Campos v. New York Health and Hospitals Corp., 163 A.D.2d 49, 557 N.Y.S.2d 81). Further, a “a subsequent change of residence to another county does not invalidate the original designation based upon plaintiff's residence at the time of the commencement of the action” (Iassinski v. Vassiliev, 220 A.D.2d 372, 374, 633 N.Y.S.2d 281, 283, citing Cardona v. Aggressive Heating, 180 A.D.2d 572, 573, 580 N.Y.S.2d 285).
As to the two physician witnesses claimed to be inconvenienced by the Bronx venue, one was an employee of defendant (see, Katz v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., 116 A.D.2d 506, 497 N.Y.S.2d 376), and as to the other, defendant has not satisfied the four part evidentiary requirement for convenience of nonparty witnesses (see, O'Brien v. Vassar Brothers Hospital, 207 A.D.2d 169, 622 N.Y.S.2d 284).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 10, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)