Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Darka PESA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered August 16, 2001, dismissing the complaint, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered May 23, 2001, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when a wooden plaque fell from a credenza and struck plaintiff on the back while she was cleaning an office in defendant's building, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the order entered May 23, 2001, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed within the appeal from the ensuing judgment.
Plaintiff's common-law negligence claim was properly dismissed for lack of evidence that the plaque, which like the other items on the credenza, had stood on the credenza in the same position without incident or complaint for years and was dusted by plaintiff once a week, constituted a foreseeable hazard. There is no evidence that the danger was created by defendant or was visible and apparent for a sufficient period of time for defendant to discover it (see Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837-838, 501 N.Y.S.2d 646, 492 N.E.2d 774). Plaintiff's Labor Law § 200 claim was properly dismissed for lack of evidence sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether defendant exercised supervisory control over her work (see Comes v. New York State Elec. & Gas Corp., 82 N.Y.2d 876, 877, 609 N.Y.S.2d 168, 631 N.E.2d 110).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 05, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)