Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dean ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael Gross, J.), rendered March 5, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 8 1/313 to 25 years, unanimously affirmed.
The record establishes that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to be present at sidebar conferences with prospective jurors. The court's comments about the disadvantages of attending such conferences, which occurred after defense counsel had already stated, on the record, in defendant's presence, that defendant was waiving his right, “clearly did not affect the voluntariness of the waiver” (People v. Abreu, 293 A.D.2d 300, 739 N.Y.S.2d 570, lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 766, 752 N.Y.S.2d 6, 781 N.E.2d 918).
The court properly denied defendant's request to receive in evidence the aided card prepared by the first officer at the scene of the shooting. The business records exception to the hearsay rule did not apply because the identity of the person who provided the information contained on the card was unknown, and concomitantly, “it was impossible to determine whether that person was under a business duty to communicate the information” (People v. Lewis, 284 A.D.2d 172, 728 N.Y.S.2d 431, lv. denied 97 N.Y.2d 706, 739 N.Y.S.2d 107, 765 N.E.2d 310).
The record establishes that defendant received meaningful representation (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584). Defendant's claim that his attorney was inadequately prepared for trial is unsupported by the record.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 08, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)