Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Eugene A. CARCONE and Concetta Carcone, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. D'ANGELO INSURANCE AGENCY, Defendant, American States Insurance Company, Defendant-Respondent (Appeal No. 2.).
Although American States Insurance Company (defendant) moved to dismiss the complaint against it under CPLR 3211(a)(1) and (7), Supreme Court issued a written decision specifying that it was granting the motion “for summary judgment” and discussing the absence of issues of fact. The order dismissed the complaint on the merits with prejudice. Where there is a conflict between an order and a decision, the decision controls (see Matter of Edward V., 204 A.D.2d 1060, 614 N.Y.S.2d 348). We agree with plaintiffs that the court improperly converted the motion to dismiss to a CPLR 3212 motion for summary judgment. Although a court may convert such a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(c), the court must give the parties notice of its intent to do so (see id.; see e.g. Mihlovan v. Grozavu, 72 N.Y.2d 506, 508, 534 N.Y.S.2d 656, 531 N.E.2d 288; Pitts v. City of Buffalo, 298 A.D.2d 1003, 749 N.Y.S.2d 343; Village of Webster v. Monroe County Water Auth., 269 A.D.2d 781, 782, 703 N.Y.S.2d 648). In the absence of such notice, the court may convert a motion to dismiss to one for summary judgment only if the parties “expressly [sought] summary judgment or [submitted] facts and arguments clearly indicating that they were ‘deliberately charting a summary judgment course’ ” (Mihlovan, 72 N.Y.2d at 508, 534 N.Y.S.2d 656, 531 N.E.2d 288, quoting Four Seasons Hotels v. Vinnik, 127 A.D.2d 310, 320, 515 N.Y.S.2d 1; see Village of Webster, 269 A.D.2d at 782, 703 N.Y.S.2d 648). Here, there is no indication that the court provided the requisite notice or that the parties expressly sought summary judgment or deliberately charted a summary judgment course. We therefore reverse the order, deny the motion and reinstate the complaint against defendant.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied and the complaint against defendant American States Insurance Company is reinstated.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 07, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)