Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raheme BYRD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered June 13, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree (two counts), burglary in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree and rape in the first degree (two counts), and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 75 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly exercised its discretion in receiving photographs of the deceased victim and the crime scene since this evidence was relevant to various trial issues and served to corroborate and illustrate the testimony of the surviving victim and defendant's confession, while not being unduly inflammatory (see People v. Wood, 79 N.Y.2d 958, 582 N.Y.S.2d 992, 591 N.E.2d 1178; People v. Stevens, 76 N.Y.2d 833, 560 N.Y.S.2d 119, 559 N.E.2d 1278; People v. Pobliner, 32 N.Y.2d 356, 370, 345 N.Y.S.2d 482, 298 N.E.2d 637, cert. denied 416 U.S. 905, 94 S.Ct. 1609, 40 L.Ed.2d 110).
The court properly ran defendant's sentence for felony murder predicated on robbery consecutive to his sentence for burglary, and ran his sentence for felony murder predicated on burglary consecutive to his sentence for robbery, because the crimes clearly involved separate and distinct acts (see People v. Lee, 92 N.Y.2d 987, 684 N.Y.S.2d 161, 706 N.E.2d 1185; People v. Abreu, 293 A.D.2d 300, 739 N.Y.S.2d 570, lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 766, 752 N.Y.S.2d 6, 781 N.E.2d 918; People v. Tucker, 278 A.D.2d 38, 717 N.Y.S.2d 151, lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 788, 725 N.Y.S.2d 653, 749 N.E.2d 222).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 06, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)