McKAY v. KHABELE (2007)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Barbara McKAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dineo KHABELE, M.D., et al., Defendants-Respondents.

Decided: December 04, 2007

LIPPMAN, P.J., MAZZARELLI, ANDRIAS, BUCKLEY, SWEENY, JJ.

Roura & Melamed, New York (Matthew R. Kreinces of counsel), for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Cheryl Payer of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered October 17, 2006, which, to the extent appealed as limited by the briefs, limited plaintiff's further depositions of defendant Khabele and nonparty Dr. Gloria Huang, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court did not act improvidently in limiting further depositions of Khabele and Huang to questions related to their notes in newly produced documents and refusing to direct them to answer all questions to which objections had been raised at their initial depositions. Plaintiff failed to justify adequately a broader scope of inquiry or to demonstrate that the limitations deprived them of deposition testimony relevant and necessary for preparation for trial (see Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Occidental Gems, Inc., 41 A.D.3d 362, 841 N.Y.S.2d 225 [2007]; Smukler v. 12 Lofts Realty, 178 A.D.2d 125, 576 N.Y.S.2d 862 [1991] ).

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network