Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: VALENTINE N.-S.S., etc., and Another, Dependent Children Under the Age of Fourteen Years, etc., Richard Edward S., etc., Respondent-Appellant, Rosangela S., etc., Respondent, St. Christopher-Ottilie, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about August 5, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, upon findings of permanent neglect, terminated the parental rights of respondent father with respect to the subject children, and committed custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The findings of permanent neglect are supported by clear and convincing evidence that, notwithstanding the agency's diligent efforts to refer respondent to numerous sex offender and domestic violence programs, respondent refused the referrals and gained no insight into the problems that led to the children's removal (see Social Service Law § 384-b[7]; Matter of Rigoberto M., 18 A.D.3d 405, 795 N.Y.S.2d 581 [2005]; Matter of Cordero D., 18 A.D.3d 382, 795 N.Y.S.2d 558 [2005]; Matter of Kaleemah Shaleah M., 6 A.D.3d 189, 775 N.Y.S.2d 252 [2004] ).
The finding that it was in the children's best interests to terminate respondent's parental rights was supported by a preponderance of the evidence at the dispositional hearing (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147-148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824 [1984] ). The children have thrived in their foster home, and the circumstances do not warrant a suspended judgment.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 13, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)