Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of TERESA D., Jasmine C. and Toni J. Erie County Department of Social Services, Petitioner-Respondent; Alethia J., a/k/a S., Respondent-Appellant.
Respondent appeals from an order of disposition adjudicating three of her children to be permanently neglected, terminating her parental rights and committing the children to the guardianship and custody of petitioner. She contends that petitioner failed to establish that it made diligent efforts to reunite the family and strengthen the parent-child relationship (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [7][f] ). We disagree.
Respondent's children came into petitioner's care on December 10, 1994 after respondent left her children with a family member and did not resume responsibility for them. The testimony of petitioner's caseworker described petitioner's repeated attempts to involve respondent in planning for the children, including keeping regular and consistent contact with the children and petitioner, following through with parenting skills training, and completing substance abuse and mental health counseling programs. Respondent failed to keep adequate and consistent contact with petitioner and the children, even during the intermittent periods when she was not incarcerated. Under the circumstances, Family Court properly determined that the children are permanently neglected. Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that respondent failed to plan for the future of the children notwithstanding its diligent efforts to strengthen and nurture the parent-child relationship (see, Matter of Gregory B., 74 N.Y.2d 77, 86, 544 N.Y.S.2d 535, 542 N.E.2d 1052).
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 07, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)