Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kemal SONMEZ, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.
WORLD ON COLUMBUS, INC., et al., Defendants-Respondents/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. LCK Restaurant Group, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered June 29, 1998, which granted the motion of defendants to strike the Sonmezes' complaint and the answer of the third-party defendant, and dismissed said pleadings with prejudice, deemed to be an appeal from the judgment entered thereon on August 21, 1998, and so considered, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The Sonmezes' complaint and the answer of third-party defendant LCK Group, Inc., an entity controlled by plaintiff Kemal Sonmez, were properly struck pursuant to CPLR 3126 by reason of Kemal Sonmez's deliberate destruction of financial records crucial to the defense of the action (see, Hyosung [Am.] v. Woodcrest Fabrics, Inc., 106 A.D.2d 298, 483 N.Y.S.2d 226, appeal dismissed 64 N.Y.2d 934, 488 N.Y.S.2d 649, 477 N.E.2d 1103). Also supportive of the motion court's determination to strike the pleadings was Kemal Sonmez's evidently willful refusal to produce other relevant records demanded by defendants and his failure to respond to questions regarding his stock ownership in World on Columbus, Inc., the corporation on behalf of which he purported to sue (see, Ricco v. Deepdale Gardens Apts. Corp., 113 A.D.2d 822, 493 N.Y.S.2d 498). Plaintiffs were not entitled to a fact-finding hearing to determine the nature of documents they wrongfully discarded.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 13, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)