Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carlos GAGOT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered October 31, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree (three counts) and attempted assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant failed to preserve his arguments that the court improperly interfered with defense counsel's examination of witnesses and improperly denigrated defense counsel (see People v. Charleston, 56 N.Y.2d 886, 887-888, 453 N.Y.S.2d 399, 438 N.E.2d 1114 [1982] ), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal. Most of the conduct challenged by defendant on appeal was permissible clarification, and even if some of the court's interventions and comments were inappropriate, they were not so egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial (see People v. Arnold, 98 N.Y.2d 63, 67, 745 N.Y.S.2d 782, 772 N.E.2d 1140 [2002]; People v. Moulton, 43 N.Y.2d 944, 403 N.Y.S.2d 892, 374 N.E.2d 1243 [1978]; compare People v. Retamozzo, 25 A.D.3d 73, 802 N.Y.S.2d 426 [2005] ).
Defendant's testimony on direct examination that he had been a victim of a crime and that he therefore carried a weapon for his own protection clearly opened the door to cross-examination about his gang affiliation (see People v. Melendez, 55 N.Y.2d 445, 451-452, 449 N.Y.S.2d 946, 434 N.E.2d 1324 [1982] ).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 09, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)