Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: SAMARA M. and Others, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Felicia M., Respondent-Appellant, Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services of the City of New York, Petitioner-Respondent.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda J. Cohen, J.), entered on or about February 24, 2003, insofar as they bring up for review and are premised upon findings that respondent mother neglected the subject children within the meaning of Family Court Act § 1012(f), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner proved by the requisite preponderance of the evidence (Matter of Nicole V., 71 N.Y.2d 112, 117, 524 N.Y.S.2d 19, 518 N.E.2d 914 [1987] ) that the subject children were neglected. There was unrebutted testimony that the mother suffered from alcohol abuse, inflicted excessive corporal punishment upon the children and exposed them to hazardous conditions in the home (see Matter of Jessica DiB., 6 A.D.3d 533, 775 N.Y.S.2d 69 [2004] ). The hearing court's reliance on out-of-court statements by one of the children was proper, the statements having been sufficiently corroborated by the caseworker's observations of bruises and scratches on the children (see Matter of Nicole H., 12 A.D.3d 182, 783 N.Y.S.2d 575 [2004] ).
Respondent's remaining arguments are unavailing. We note that her arguments respecting the children's representation by the law guardian during the dispositional phase of the neglect proceedings are not properly before us, the term of the placement directed in the orders of disposition having expired.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 16, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)