Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frankie RIVERA, a/k/a Jose Abinacer, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered July 15, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to consecutive terms of 5 to 15 years on the assault convictions, and a concurrent term of 5 to 15 years on the weapon possession conviction, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant failed to preserve his current claim that the court did not properly instruct the jury pursuant to CPL 310.20(2) regarding the purpose of adding the individual complainants' names on the verdict sheet listing two separate counts of assault in the first degree (see, People v. Wheeler, 257 A.D.2d 673, 685 N.Y.S.2d 94), and we decline to review this claim in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that the court's instructions to the jury effectively conveyed the import of the annotations.
A review of the trial evidence, including evidence of the firing of five to six shots, each of which constituted a separate act (People v. Reyes, 239 A.D.2d 524, 525, 658 N.Y.S.2d 353, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 909, 663 N.Y.S.2d 521, 686 N.E.2d 233), as well as the circumstances surrounding the shooting of the two individuals, establishes that there was a sufficient factual basis for the court to conclude that the victims were wounded by different bullets, thereby supporting the imposition of consecutive sentences in connection with the assault convictions (see, People v. DiLapo, 14 N.Y.2d 170, 174, 250 N.Y.S.2d 261, 199 N.E.2d 361).
We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 03, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)