Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: YADIRA W., et al., Dependent Children Under Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Norma Jean W., Respondent-Appellant, v. Leake and Watts Services, Inc., Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about December 23, 1997, terminating respondent's parental rights to the subject children and committing their custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence of respondent's repeated drug use, which required the children to be placed in foster care from the time they left the hospital after their births, and which has continued despite petitioner's diligent efforts to help respondent deal with her addiction (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [c]; Matter of Selathia Nicole F., 243 A.D.2d 400, 663 N.Y.S.2d 183, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 806, 669 N.Y.S.2d 1, 691 N.E.2d 1027; Matter of Lameek L., 226 A.D.2d 464, 640 N.Y.S.2d 600). In addition, we note that respondent attended only five visits with the children over the 20-month period preceding the fact-finding hearing. The finding that termination of respondent's parental rights is in the children's best interests is supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence including, among other things, that the foster mother, who wants to adopt them, has been providing quality care for their special needs arising out of their developmental delays and chronic asthma. While respondent appears to have made some progress in her most recent drug program, the improvement came too late, and the children should not have to wait any longer for respondent's rehabilitation and a permanent home (see, Matter of A. Children, 236 A.D.2d 271, 272, 653 N.Y.S.2d 342; Matter of Anthony Julius A., 231 A.D.2d 462, 647 N.Y.S.2d 212).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 27, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)