DIAZ v. RODRIGUEZ (2004)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Liberto DIAZ, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Blasina RODRIGUEZ, also known as Blasina Ortiz, Defendant-Respondent.

Decided: October 12, 2004

BUCKLEY, P.J., NARDELLI, ANDRIAS, SAXE, LERNER, JJ.

Roberto Lebron, Bronx, for appellants. Jakubowski Robertson & Goldsmith, Saint James (Mark Goldsmith of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered July 8, 2003, which denied plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs defaulted when they failed to notify defendant as to their ability to obtain a mortgage by the deadline and proceed to closing. In light of that breach of contract, they were not entitled to recover their down payment (see Maxton Bldrs. v. Lo Galbo, 68 N.Y.2d 373, 509 N.Y.S.2d 507, 502 N.E.2d 184 [1986] ).

We have considered defendants' remaining contentions and find them without merit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network