Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Sharlene STEVENS, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. BRONX CROSS COUNTY MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered September 9, 1997, which, upon a jury verdict, awarded plaintiffs damages structured pursuant to CPLR 5031, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Upon review of the record in this medical malpractice action, we conclude that the jury's resolution of credibility issues, particularly with respect to the sharply conflicting testimony of the medical experts, was not against the weight of the evidence. As a result of the malpractice, plaintiff had already undergone two hip replacement operations at the age of 21, and it was estimated that she would require replacement surgery periodically, at least five or six more times, during the balance of her life. Accordingly, we do not believe that the $3 million award for past and future pain and suffering deviates materially from what is reasonable compensation in these circumstances (CPLR 5501[c] ).
Defendant's argument that Dr. Sedlin, an orthopedic surgeon, was not competent to give expert testimony regarding accepted standards of pediatric examinations with respect to testing for signs of slipped capitol femoral epiphysis, is not preserved for review (see, Kwasny v. Feinberg, 157 A.D.2d 396, 400, 557 N.Y.S.2d 381; Smith v. City of New York, 238 A.D.2d 500, 656 N.Y.S.2d 681), and we decline to review it, especially since, had a timely objection been made by defendants at trial, plaintiffs might have made a more extensive showing of Dr. Sedlin's expert qualifications. In any event, the circumstance that Dr. Sedlin was not a pediatrician, properly considered as, indeed, it was by the jury, went to the weight rather than the admissibility of his testimony (see, Fuller v. Preis, 35 N.Y.2d 425, 431, 363 N.Y.S.2d 568, 322 N.E.2d 263).
We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be unavailing.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 17, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)