Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
525 FULTON STREET HOLDING CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MISSION NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered April 17, 1996, which, in a proceeding to recover for water damage under an all-risk insurance policy, denied plaintiff insured's motion to reject the Referee's report recommending denial of plaintiff's claim, and granted defendant Liquidator's cross motion to confirm the report, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The Referee correctly held that the burden is on plaintiff to prove that the water damage it sustained was caused by a “fortuitous” event within the meaning of the policy, and not on defendant to prove the contrary (see, Avid Equities v. Commerce & Indus. Ins. Co., 225 A.D.2d 446, 639 N.Y.S.2d 352). The record supports the Referee's finding that plaintiff failed to sustain this burden, plaintiff's attempt to show that pipe corrosion was the cause of the leak that caused the damage having been countered by defendant's showing that pipe corrosion would have caused a slow leak detectable as it gradually grew larger and not the gushing of water that admittedly occurred, and that a valve at or near the source of the leak had been smashed with a blunt instrument. Plaintiff's only rejoinder to this evidence of external physical force, that the valve deformity was caused when plaintiff's plumber struck the valve with a chisel while making repairs, was rebutted, and at best raised an issue of credibility for the Referee (see, Freedman v. Freedman, 211 A.D.2d 580, 621 N.Y.S.2d 610). We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them to be unavailing.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 29, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)