Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frederick MIDDLETON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Covington, J.), rendered October 30, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and resisting arrest, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 31/212 to 7 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The court's summary denial of defendant's suppression motion was proper since his papers merely contained conclusory assertions that he was not engaging in unlawful activity or suspicious behavior prior to his seizure (see, People v. Seda, 198 A.D.2d 98, 603 N.Y.S.2d 471, lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 930, 610 N.Y.S.2d 182, 632 N.E.2d 492) or otherwise properly address the factual allegations contained in the felony complaint.
Defendant was not prejudiced by the expert testimony concerning specific characteristics of the automatic pistol involved in the case. Such ballistic testimony was admissible as necessary background information concerning the element of operability, was part of the expert's narrative as to his observations, and did not suggest that defendant was a violent person (see, People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233, 245, 525 N.Y.S.2d 7, 519 N.E.2d 808).
Defendant's challenges to the court's Allen charge are unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to review these claims in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the charge, as a whole, was proper.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 29, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)