Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Rosa Lee POOLE, Petitioner, v. Brian J. WING, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Temporary and Disability Assistance, and Zachary Karmen, as Commissioner of Onondaga County Department of Social Services, Respondents.
The determination that petitioner willfully and without good cause failed to comply with the requirements of the Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training Program (JOBS program) is supported by substantial evidence (see, 18 NYCRR former 385.19[c]; Matter of Vicari v. Wing, 244 A.D.2d 974, 665 N.Y.S.2d 209). “Ineligibility for assistance continues until the applicant agrees to comply with the requirements and demonstrates such compliance where appropriate” (18 NYCRR former 385.19[a] ). “An individual is deemed not to have willfully failed or refused to comply without good cause with JOBS program requirements * * * if the evidence shows that: * * * (xiii) temporary and verified illness incapacitated the applicant or recipient” (18 NYCRR former 385.19[d][2] ). At the conciliation meeting (see, 18 NYCRR former 385.18), petitioner did not produce any verification that she was incapacitated by her alleged medical condition. The note that she produced from her physical therapist at the fair hearing did not verify that she was incapacitated by that condition. Petitioner admitted that her doctor never told her that she was too ill to participate in the JOBS program. Furthermore, she testified that she is able to perform her daily routine as long as she does not do “too much”. The JOBS program involved principally classroom instruction and training and petitioner was free to stand, if necessary, to relieve her pain. Petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 31, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)