Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Rona TROKIE, etc. et al., Plaintiffs, v. YORK PREPARATORY SCHOOL, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Horowitz/Immerman, Architects, P.C., Defendant, Pung Sang Construction Corp., Defendant-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered March 29, 2000, and order same court (Franklin Weissberg, J.), entered June 23, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, limited defendant-appellant York Preparatory School, Inc.'s remedy for defendant-respondent Pung Sang Construction Corp.'s breach of a construction contract's insurance procurement clause to recovery of the premium paid by York to procure its own liability insurance, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of adding York's right to seek damages for any other expense arising out of the liability claim and not covered by substitute insurance, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The proper measure of York Preparatory School's damages for Pung Sang's breach of the subject insurance procurement clause is the full cost of insurance to York, i.e., the premiums it paid for its own insurance, any out-of-pocket costs that may have been incurred incidental to the policy, and any increase in its future insurance premiums resulting from the liability claim (see, Inchaustegui v. 666 5th Ave. Ltd. Partnership, 96 N.Y.2d 111, 725 N.Y.S.2d 627, 749 N.E.2d 196). Since York only cross-moved for partial summary judgment on the breach of the insurance procurement provision, it may not now argue, for the first time on appeal, that it is entitled to judgment based on the contract's indemnity clause (see, Fisher v. Socy. of the New York Hosp., 271 A.D.2d 262, 707 N.Y.S.2d 43).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 07, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)