Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Farianny GERALDINO, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF NEW YORK, INC., et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered October 10, 2001, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when infant plaintiff was hit by a truck owned and operated by defendants, granted defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 510(3) to change venue from Bronx County to New York County, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the motion denied.
In this personal injury action involving a pedestrian knockdown which occurred in New York County, infant plaintiff properly placed venue in Bronx County in the first instance (see CPLR 503[a] ). Subsequently, defendants sought a venue change to New York County, based on the convenience of material witnesses. The court granted the motion on the ground that defendants satisfied their burden of demonstrating that the convenience of material witnesses would be better served by the change.
Counsel's bare allegation, in support of defendants' motion, that the witness, who resides on the upper west side of New York County and works as a home health care provider in New York County, “would be inconvenienced if venue of this action remained in Bronx County” is “ludicrous on its face” (Rodriguez v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 100 A.D.2d 811, 474 N.Y.S.2d 743; accord Cardona v. Aggressive Heating Inc., 180 A.D.2d 572, 580 N.Y.S.2d 285). Under these circumstances, to grant a venue change from the Bronx to New York County, “a subway ride away, constitutes an improvident exercise of discretion. Viewed realistically, this motion is nothing more than ․ ‘forum shopping.’ ” (Rodriguez, supra, 100 A.D.2d at 811, 474 N.Y.S.2d 743.)
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 10, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)