Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Eric REID, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination that he violated inmate rules 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2[B][14] [i] [possession of a weapon] ) and 114.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2[B][15][i] [smuggling] ). The determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 113.10 is supported by substantial evidence (see People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130, 139, 495 N.Y.S.2d 332, 485 N.E.2d 997), but, as respondent concedes, the determination that he violated inmate rule 114.10 is not supported by substantial evidence. We therefore modify the determination and grant the petition in part by annulling that part of the determination finding that petitioner violated inmate rule 114.10, and we direct respondent to expunge from petitioner's institutional record all references to the violation of that rule. Because the penalty of 180 days in the special housing unit and loss of telephone, packages and commissary privileges has already been served, there is no need to remit the matter to respondent for reconsideration of that penalty.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously modified on the law and the petition is granted in part by annulling that part of the determination finding that petitioner violated inmate rule 114.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2[B][15] [i] ) and as modified the determination is confirmed without costs, and respondent is directed to expunge from petitioner's institutional record all references to the violation of that rule.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 03, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)