Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Mary E. CONNELLY-LOGAL, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Sharon M. WEST, as Executive Director of Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority, Cheryl J. MacMillan, as Director of Administration and Finance of Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority, Board of Commissioners of Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority, Respondents-Appellants, et al., Respondent.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking review of the determination terminating her employment as an audit inspector for the Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority after its Board of Commissioners abolished that position. Sharon M. West, as Executive Director of the Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority, Cheryl J. MacMillan, as Director of Administration and Finance of the Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority, and the Board of Commissioners of the Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority (respondents) appeal from a judgment entered after a nonjury trial (see, CPLR 7804[h] ) that was commenced before one Supreme Court Justice and concluded before another Justice. Respondents contend that the second Justice violated Judiciary Law § 21 by continuing the trial and determining issues involving the credibility of witnesses, whose testimony only the first Justice heard. We agree. Although respondents failed to object, “[t]he right to have a decision made by the Trial Judge who presided over the entire matter is so basic and fundamental that it is not waived by the failure of counsel to object at the time of the [trial]” (Michel v. Michel, 31 A.D.2d 313, 316, 297 N.Y.S.2d 250).
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and new trial granted.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 10, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)